relicensing LLGPL → GPLv3 #12

Closed
opened 2022-08-26 08:00:42 +00:00 by zzkt · 2 comments
zzkt commented 2022-08-26 08:00:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Based on the discussion and analysis on cliki about the LLGPL (in particular Eli Greenbaum's detailed examination of the LLGPL) I think it makes sense to change the licence to GPLv3 (or later).

If there is anyone who has contributed to the library that objects to this please let me know.

Based on the discussion and analysis on [cliki](https://www.cliki.net/LLGPL) about the [LLGPL](https://www.cliki.net/LLGPL) (in particular [Eli Greenbaum's detailed examination of the LLGPL](https://www.ifosslr.org/index.php/ifosslr/article/view/75/146)) I think it makes sense to change the licence to GPLv3 (or later). If there is anyone who has contributed to the library that objects to this please let me know.
zzkt commented 2022-08-26 08:04:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

cc @PuercoPop @boqs @erikronstrom @jamieforth

cc @PuercoPop @boqs @erikronstrom @jamieforth
PuercoPop commented 2022-08-29 18:17:01 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@zzkt I'm always in favor of the strongest copyleft possible until the time IP is abolished. If anything I'd recommend AGPLv3! 👍

@zzkt I'm always in favor of the strongest copyleft possible until the time IP is abolished. If anything I'd recommend AGPLv3! 👍
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: zzkt/osc#12
No description provided.