From b248ea0b4dbbfd045af955e321684935add24131 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nik gaffney Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:47:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] space --- README.org | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.org b/README.org index f1bb80f..6e6c1b1 100644 --- a/README.org +++ b/README.org @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ "When writing Alien Phenomenology I found myself wondering, what would happen if we put ontography, Latour Litany, and carpentry together? Here’s one simple take, a 'Latour Litanizer.' It uses Wikipedia’s random page API to generate lists of things [...] Like all Latour Litanies, this little gadget underscores the rich diversity of things. It also reminds us that human beings are among them, since a large number of Wikipedia articles describe living and historical persons." —Ian Bogost -"Bogost’s Latour Litanizer might be the first genuine piece of laboratory equipment ever created for philosophy." +"[The] Latour Litanizer might be the first genuine piece of laboratory equipment ever created for philosophy." —Levi R. Bryant This is a simple version of Ian Bogost's method of generating "Latour Litanies" in emacs as a further (or furthering) exercise in ontography, metaphorism, and carpentry. @@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ This is a simple version of Ian Bogost's method of generating "Latour Litanies" ** Further - - [[ http://bogost.com/writing/blog/latour_litanizer/][Latour Litanizer. Generate your own Latour Litanies]] + - [[http://bogost.com/writing/blog/latour_litanizer/][Latour Litanizer. Generate your own Latour Litanies]] - [[http://bogost.com/writing/blog/a_litany_of_litanies/][A Litany of Litanies. Reactions to the Latour Litanizer]] - [[http://ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com/2016/10/why-latour-litanies-dont-use-adjectives.html][Why Latour Litanies Don't Use Adjectives (in case you were wondering)]]