From 09aa6c3fdf6cdfd4582cd0d3039518afa4ad5817 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nik gaffney Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:44:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] further litanies --- README.org | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.org b/README.org index e7d12cb..f1bb80f 100644 --- a/README.org +++ b/README.org @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ "When writing Alien Phenomenology I found myself wondering, what would happen if we put ontography, Latour Litany, and carpentry together? Here’s one simple take, a 'Latour Litanizer.' It uses Wikipedia’s random page API to generate lists of things [...] Like all Latour Litanies, this little gadget underscores the rich diversity of things. It also reminds us that human beings are among them, since a large number of Wikipedia articles describe living and historical persons." —Ian Bogost +"Bogost’s Latour Litanizer might be the first genuine piece of laboratory equipment ever created for philosophy." +—Levi R. Bryant + This is a simple version of Ian Bogost's method of generating "Latour Litanies" in emacs as a further (or furthering) exercise in ontography, metaphorism, and carpentry. ** Litanizing @@ -14,4 +17,6 @@ This is a simple version of Ian Bogost's method of generating "Latour Litanies" ** Further - - http://bogost.com/writing/blog/latour_litanizer/ + - [[ http://bogost.com/writing/blog/latour_litanizer/][Latour Litanizer. Generate your own Latour Litanies]] + - [[http://bogost.com/writing/blog/a_litany_of_litanies/][A Litany of Litanies. Reactions to the Latour Litanizer]] + - [[http://ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com/2016/10/why-latour-litanies-dont-use-adjectives.html][Why Latour Litanies Don't Use Adjectives (in case you were wondering)]]